WoRMS name details

Megalomphalus depressus (G. Seguenza, 1876)

1730789  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1730789)

 unaccepted
Species
Adeorbis depressus (G. Seguenza, 1876) · unaccepted > superseded combination
Fossarus depressus G. Seguenza, 1874 · unaccepted > nomen nudum
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
(of Fossarus depressus G. Seguenza, 1876) Seguenza G. (1873-1877). Studi stratigrafici sulla formazione pliocenica dell'Italia meridionale. <em>Bollettino, Reale Comitato Geologico d'Italia.</em> 4: 29-45, 84-103, 131-153, 213-230, 280-301, 345-357 [1873]; 5: 3-15, 67-85, 146-152, 271-283, 331-347 [1874]; 6: 18-31, 82-99, 145-152, 203-211, 275-283, 339-345 [1875]; 7: 7-15, 91-103, 179-189, 260-271, 355-359 [1876] 8: 7-17, 91-99, 359-367 [1877]., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/53765726
page(s): vol. 7 p. 180 [details] 
Nomenclature Adeorbis seguenzanius Tryon, 1888, was proposed as a replacement name for Fossarus depressus G. Seguenza, 1876 because of...  
Nomenclature Adeorbis seguenzanius Tryon, 1888, was proposed as a replacement name for Fossarus depressus G. Seguenza, 1876 because of supposed secondary homonymy with Adeorbis depressus A. Adams, 1861.The latter is of uncertain affinity; no types were found in the British Museum of Natural History or in National Museum of Victoria, Melbourne.Therefore the secondary homonymy is very uncertain, but the replacement name introduced before1961 (ICZN Art, 59.3) and in use (as Tornus seguenzianus) permanently invalidates Seguenza's name.  [details]

Taxonomy [Megalomphalus] depressus is from deeper water (down to 195 m) and we suspect that it simply is a deep water form of...  
Taxonomy [Megalomphalus] depressus is from deeper water (down to 195 m) and we suspect that it simply is a deep water form of azonus. We are, however, not certain about this and recommend that the two names should be used whenever it is possible to classify specimens as belonging to one or the other of the two forms, to avoid confusion if they should turn out to be distinct species.  [details]
MolluscaBase eds. (2025). MolluscaBase. Megalomphalus depressus (G. Seguenza, 1876). Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1730789 on 2025-04-04
Date
action
by
2024-01-21 09:28:59Z
created
2025-03-26 10:44:19Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


Nomenclature

original description (of Fossarus depressus G. Seguenza, 1876) Seguenza G. (1873-1877). Studi stratigrafici sulla formazione pliocenica dell'Italia meridionale. <em>Bollettino, Reale Comitato Geologico d'Italia.</em> 4: 29-45, 84-103, 131-153, 213-230, 280-301, 345-357 [1873]; 5: 3-15, 67-85, 146-152, 271-283, 331-347 [1874]; 6: 18-31, 82-99, 145-152, 203-211, 275-283, 339-345 [1875]; 7: 7-15, 91-103, 179-189, 260-271, 355-359 [1876] 8: 7-17, 91-99, 359-367 [1877]., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/53765726
page(s): vol. 7 p. 180 [details] 

basis of record Brusina, S. (1886). Appunti ed osservazioni sull'ultimo lavoro di J. Gwyn Jeffreys. <em>Glasnik Hrvatskoga Naravoslovnoga DrusĖŒtva, Zagreb.</em> 1: 182-221., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/11273702
page(s): 217-219 [details] 

 
 Present  Present in aphia/obis/gbif/idigbio   Inaccurate  Introduced: alien  Containing type locality 
   

From editor or global species database
Nomenclature Adeorbis seguenzanius Tryon, 1888, was proposed as a replacement name for Fossarus depressus G. Seguenza, 1876 because of supposed secondary homonymy with Adeorbis depressus A. Adams, 1861.The latter is of uncertain affinity; no types were found in the British Museum of Natural History or in National Museum of Victoria, Melbourne.Therefore the secondary homonymy is very uncertain, but the replacement name introduced before1961 (ICZN Art, 59.3) and in use (as Tornus seguenzianus) permanently invalidates Seguenza's name.  [details]

Taxonomy [Megalomphalus] depressus is from deeper water (down to 195 m) and we suspect that it simply is a deep water form of azonus. We are, however, not certain about this and recommend that the two names should be used whenever it is possible to classify specimens as belonging to one or the other of the two forms, to avoid confusion if they should turn out to be distinct species.  [details]
This service is powered by LifeWatch Belgium
Learn more»
Website and databases developed and hosted by Flanders Marine Institute · Page generated on 2025-04-06 01:19:27+02:00  · Contact: Data Management Team