WoRMS name details
Conus floridanus Gabb, 1869
429079 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:429079)
unaccepted > junior subjective synonym
Species
Conus (Leptoconus) floridanus (Gabb, 1869) · alternative representation
Conus floridanus floridensis G. B. Sowerby II, 1870 · unaccepted
Gradiconus floridanus (Gabb, 1869) · unaccepted
- Subspecies Conus floridanus burryae Clench, 1942 accepted as Conus burryae Clench, 1942 (basionym)
- Forma Conus floridanus f. floridensis G. B. Sowerby II, 1870 accepted as Conus floridanus Gabb, 1869 accepted as Conus anabathrum Crosse, 1865
- Subspecies Conus floridanus floridensis G. B. Sowerby II, 1870 accepted as Conus floridanus Gabb, 1869 accepted as Conus anabathrum Crosse, 1865
- Subspecies Conus floridanus patglicksteinae Petuch, 1987 accepted as Conus patglicksteinae Petuch, 1987
- Subspecies Conus floridanus tranthami Petuch, 1995 accepted as Conus tranthami Petuch, 1995
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
Gabb, W. M. 1869. Description of a new cone from the coast of Florida. American Journal of Conchology 4(4):195-196, pl. 15. [details]
Nomenclature ICZN Opinion 1539 (Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 46(2): 140) has ruled that the name Conus floridanus Gabb, 1869, is...
Nomenclature ICZN Opinion 1539 (Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 46(2): 140) has ruled that the name Conus floridanus Gabb, 1869, is not to be given precedence over Conus anabathrum Crosse, 1865, by those authors considering that the two names refer to the same species. However, it had not declared Conus floridanus invalid or unavailable, and it remained a potentially valid name. The revalidation of the species Conus floridanus by Berschauer (2022) was nomenclaturally perfectly permissible, but is not tenable now when Leal et al. (2024) show that anabathrum and floridanus refer to the same taxonomical species.. [details]
MolluscaBase eds. (2024). MolluscaBase. Conus floridanus Gabb, 1869. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=429079 on 2024-11-21
Date
action
by
The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
original description
Gabb, W. M. 1869. Description of a new cone from the coast of Florida. American Journal of Conchology 4(4):195-196, pl. 15. [details]
additional source Mansfield, W. C. (1930). Miocene gastropods and scaphopods of the Choctawhatchee Formation of Florida. <em>Florida State Geological Survey, Bulletin.</em> 3: 1-185, 21 pls., available online at https://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00000437/00001
page(s): 32, pl. 1, fig. 13 [details]
additional source Tucker J.K. & Tenorio M.J. (2013) <i>Illustrated catalog of the living cone shells</i>. 517 pp. Wellington, Florida: MdM Publishing.
note: treated as synonym of C. anabathrum [details]
status source Berschauer, D.P. (2022). The true identity of <i>Gradiconus anabathrum</i> (Crosse, 1865). <em>Xenophora Taxonomy.</em> 35: 43-48.
note: treated a a valid species [details]
additional source Mansfield, W. C. (1930). Miocene gastropods and scaphopods of the Choctawhatchee Formation of Florida. <em>Florida State Geological Survey, Bulletin.</em> 3: 1-185, 21 pls., available online at https://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00000437/00001
page(s): 32, pl. 1, fig. 13 [details]
additional source Tucker J.K. & Tenorio M.J. (2013) <i>Illustrated catalog of the living cone shells</i>. 517 pp. Wellington, Florida: MdM Publishing.
note: treated as synonym of C. anabathrum [details]
status source Berschauer, D.P. (2022). The true identity of <i>Gradiconus anabathrum</i> (Crosse, 1865). <em>Xenophora Taxonomy.</em> 35: 43-48.
note: treated a a valid species [details]
From editor or global species database
Nomenclature ICZN Opinion 1539 (Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 46(2): 140) has ruled that the name Conus floridanus Gabb, 1869, is not to be given precedence over Conus anabathrum Crosse, 1865, by those authors considering that the two names refer to the same species. However, it had not declared Conus floridanus invalid or unavailable, and it remained a potentially valid name. The revalidation of the species Conus floridanus by Berschauer (2022) was nomenclaturally perfectly permissible, but is not tenable now when Leal et al. (2024) show that anabathrum and floridanus refer to the same taxonomical species.. [details]
To ANSP Malacology Collection (holotype of Conus floridanus. Gabb, 1868. American Journal of Conchology 4 (4): 195, pl. 15, fig. 4 - catalog no. 8097)
To Biodiversity Heritage Library (1 publication) (from synonym Conus floridanus floridensis G. B. Sowerby II, 1870)
To Biodiversity Heritage Library (34 publications)
To GenBank (5 nucleotides; 5 proteins)
To GenBank (5 nucleotides; 5 proteins) (from synonym Conus floridanus floridensis G. B. Sowerby II, 1870)
To Malacopics (Conus floridensis G.B.Sowerby,187 POSSIBLE SYNTYPE United States, Florida)
To NMNH Extant Collection (Conus floridanus Gabb, 1868 (USNM 834434) dorsal view)
To USNM Invertebrate Zoology Mollusca Collection
To ITIS
To Biodiversity Heritage Library (1 publication) (from synonym Conus floridanus floridensis G. B. Sowerby II, 1870)
To Biodiversity Heritage Library (34 publications)
To GenBank (5 nucleotides; 5 proteins)
To GenBank (5 nucleotides; 5 proteins) (from synonym Conus floridanus floridensis G. B. Sowerby II, 1870)
To Malacopics (Conus floridensis G.B.Sowerby,187 POSSIBLE SYNTYPE United States, Florida)
To NMNH Extant Collection (Conus floridanus Gabb, 1868 (USNM 834434) dorsal view)
To USNM Invertebrate Zoology Mollusca Collection
To ITIS